CO129-124 - Sir MacDonnell - 1867 [8-9] — Page 377

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Ordinance No 12 of 1867.

368

Acting Attorney General's Report

The provisions of Ordinance No 9 of 1866 have been too much canvassed both in this Colony and at Home that I see no reason why at an early day should not be fixed for bringing this Ordinance into operation.

Section 7 seems to me the only clause which calls for explanation. The object of its introduction was to relieve the doubts which existed in the mind of the Chief Justice as to whether Ordinance No 7 of 1866 dispensed with a Jury. It certainly was intended at the time of the passing of the Ordinance that the High Court should have jurisdiction to try the offences therein enumerated without the intervention of a jury and but for the suggestion of the Chief Justice

Edit History

2026-05-19 21:40:52 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Ordinance No 12 of 1867. 368 Acting Attorney General's Report The provisions of Ordinance No 9 of 1866 have been too much canvassed both in this Colony and at Home that I see no reason why at an early day should not be fixed for bringing this Ordinance into operation. Section 7 seems to me the only clause which calls for explanation. The object of its introduction was to relieve the doubts which existed in the mind of the Chief Justice as to whether Ordinance No 7 of 1866 dispensed with a Jury. It certainly was intended at the time of the passing of the Ordinance that the High Court should have jurisdiction to try the offences therein enumerated without the intervention of a jury and but for the suggestion of the Chief Justice
Baseline (Original)
* Ordinance No 12 of 1867. 368 Acting Attorney General's Report The provisions of Cadiance N9 of 1866 have been to much canvassed.... both in this Colony this Colony and at thou that I see no reason why Home ar early day should not be fixed for bunging this Ordnance nito operation. Section / Peems to me the only clause which calls for explanation. The object of its introduction was to relieve the doubts which existed in the ancird of the Chief Justice as to whether Ordinance No 7 of 1866 dispensed_. with a Jury. It certainly was __ uitended at the time of the passing of the Cirdnance that the should have High Court jurisdiction to try the offences therem eum therem enumerated without the intervention of a sury and but for the suggestion of the Chief Justice
2026-05-19 21:40:52 · Baseline
View content

*

Ordinance No 12 of 1867.

368

Acting Attorney General's Report

The

provisions of Cadiance N9 of 1866 have been to much canvassed....

both in this Colony

this Colony and at thou

that I see no

reason why

Home

ar

early

day should not be fixed for bunging this Ordnance nito operation.

Section / Peems to me the only clause

which calls for explanation. The object of its introduction was to relieve the doubts which existed in the

ancird of the Chief Justice as to whether Ordinance No 7 of 1866 dispensed_. with a Jury. It certainly was __

uitended at the time of the passing of the Cirdnance that the

should have

High Court

jurisdiction

to try the

offences therem eum

therem enumerated without

the intervention of a sury and but

for

the

suggestion of the Chief Justice

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.