Ordinance No 12 of 1867.
368
Acting Attorney General's Report
The provisions of Ordinance No 9 of 1866 have been too much canvassed both in this Colony and at Home that I see no reason why at an early day should not be fixed for bringing this Ordinance into operation.
Section 7 seems to me the only clause which calls for explanation. The object of its introduction was to relieve the doubts which existed in the mind of the Chief Justice as to whether Ordinance No 7 of 1866 dispensed with a Jury. It certainly was intended at the time of the passing of the Ordinance that the High Court should have jurisdiction to try the offences therein enumerated without the intervention of a jury and but for the suggestion of the Chief Justice
*
Ordinance No 12 of 1867.
368
Acting Attorney General's Report
The
provisions of Cadiance N9 of 1866 have been to much canvassed....
both in this Colony
this Colony and at thou
that I see no
reason why
Home
ar
early
day should not be fixed for bunging this Ordnance nito operation.
Section / Peems to me the only clause
which calls for explanation. The object of its introduction was to relieve the doubts which existed in the
ancird of the Chief Justice as to whether Ordinance No 7 of 1866 dispensed_. with a Jury. It certainly was __
uitended at the time of the passing of the Cirdnance that the
should have
High Court
jurisdiction
to try the
offences therem eum
therem enumerated without
the intervention of a sury and but
for
the
suggestion of the Chief Justice
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.